WAAS - iFly General Discussions - iFly EFB

iFly GPS Forum

We have a new Forum!  Go here to get started: https://adventurepilot.community.forum.  
The new forum is easier to use and much more capable than the old, we hope you will join our community! 

Below is a copy of the old forum. This will remain available for a short period so you can access and review the information contained here. To continue a conversation, or start a new one, please register and create a post at our new forum location.
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...WAASWAAS
Previous
 
Next
New Post
9/22/2012 11:30 PM
 
WAAS 

Has anybody heard when WAAS will be adapted? The 720 would be a perfect replacement for my 496, but it needs to be able to input WAAS GPS position into the Trig 31 transponder so the ADSb out will function.

 
New Post
9/24/2012 11:20 AM
 

Jerry,

We continue to have an internal debate about the pros and cons of enabling WAAS. The "cons" are: It would require an external antenna, (external to the airplane would be best, which we don't currently offer). Without such an antenna if you enable WAAS even a traditional lock may take longer to aquire.

The "pros" of using WAAS on our GPS sort of give me the shivers. Using a non certified GPS in the ADSB system probably doesn't intruduce a big safety concern...but I'm sure the FAA wouldn't smile on that. But, using any handheld GPS to perform a percision approach is simply not a good idea, and I really don't want folks to use an iFly for that purpose. It's a great source of additional information to help navigate an approach, but that's it. It shouldn't be used to shoot a zero visibility percision approach, which is when you need WAAS resolution.

Beyond doing a percision approach, the difference between 30' or 5' of error is simply not relevant so the "cons" win and we haven't enabled it.

So, let the debate resume: Please provide thoughts, feedback, recomendations and we'll again consider enabling WAAS on our iFlys.

Thanks!
Walter


Walter Boyd
President, Adventure Pilot
 
New Post
9/24/2012 1:25 PM
 

Thanks for the response.

i whole heatedly agree with you on the handheld GPS being used for approaches. I also understand the 2020 mandate and knew that after that date a certified GPS will be required. In the interim any WAAS GPS is able to input valid data into xpndrs. I currently have a 496 doing the chore and was hoping to upgrade to your unit.

i will certainly keep an eye on the 720 for possible upgrades.

Jerry

 
New Post
9/24/2012 4:17 PM
 

Jerry, I didn't realize the FAA was allowing non certified devices to provide the GPS data. That may push me over the edge. I'll keep you posted.

-Walter


Walter Boyd
President, Adventure Pilot
 
New Post
9/25/2012 12:54 AM
 
Another pro waas guy here . The various gps programs coming about between Ipad's and androids is making the choice in aviation GPS very competitive . The gyroscopes in these units are making attitude gyros ( not approved )available so the more AP has to offer the better . As a vested customer since the early days I want AP to thrive . The more AP has to bring to the table the better for the company and end user .

If someone attempts to fly actual approaches using an Ifly I think they are going to do it with waas or not . I would like to have Waas so when I fly IFR using steam gauges the additional accuracy will improve situational awareness and heaven forbid a major electrical or vacuum issue having waas in an emergency couldnt hurt . I must admit I have an external antenna on the top of my aircraft so for me waas would be a bonus .

Just my 2 cents ..
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...WAASWAAS